September 29, 2025
Most leaders dread the idea of retreat.
It sounds like failure — like giving up hard-won ground.
But in both war and business, retreat has often been the move that preserved strength, cut losses, and opened the path to future victory.
The true mistake is not retreating when the situation demands it.
In classic military doctrine, retreat is not chaos — it’s a controlled maneuver.
In business, the same applies.
Sometimes the smartest play is to abandon a segment, a market, or a product that drains resources — to focus where you can truly win.
In the 1990s, IBM was locked in a losing battle in the personal computer market.
Margins shrank, Asian competitors undercut prices, and PCs were no longer IBM’s stronghold.
Instead of doubling down, IBM retreated from hardware:
The result? IBM not only survived but thrived in the following decades — all because it chose to retreat from a battlefield where victory was no longer possible.
A retreat becomes the right move when:
A strategic retreat preserves your core advantage:
The strongest leaders know that victory isn’t about holding every hill — it’s about holding the right hills.
Retreat is not defeat. It is a disciplined decision to preserve your strength for the battles that truly matter.
Markets are dynamic battlefields.
Knowing when to step back is often the most courageous — and most profitable — move a leader can make.