The Battles That Can’t Be Avoided

Most strategies teach you to dance around the strong, to sneak through gaps or chip away at the edges.
But sometimes the battlefield leaves you no such luxury.

Sometimes the young challenger kicks down the door, gunning for the throne.
Other times the market is held hostage by an old lion — slow, complacent, but still blocking the way.
In both cases, the only way forward is straight through.

This is the essence of the Frontal Attack:
a doctrine where you engage your competitor head-on, matching them in product, pricing, or positioning. A deliberate, concentrated strike aimed at your rival’s core position — the very ground they believe no one can take from them.

It’s not subtle.
It’s not cheap.
It’s costly, risky, and often brutal. But in some markets — especially those with fragmented competition or weak incumbents — it’s the surest way to establish dominance fast.

Setting the Battlefield

In business, as in military history, frontal attacks are rarely subtle.
You line up your forces directly against your rival’s strongest line and push.

This doctrine works best when:

• The market is large and growing fast (room to capture share).
• The target competitor is over-extended or slow to respond.
• You can match them feature-for-feature but execute better (faster, cheaper, stronger).
• There’s low differentiation between offers — customers mainly care about price, convenience, or availability.

It fails when:

• The incumbent has entrenched loyalty or significant scale advantage.
• The challenger is under-resourced and burns out in a prolonged fight.
• Market is shrinking (making the battle purely zero-sum).

Case Example: Coca-Cola vs. Pepsi

Few rivalries illustrate Frontal Attack better than this century-long battle.

• Same battlefield: carbonated cola drinks.
• Same weapons: flavor profile, mass advertising, bottling and distribution scale.
• Same targets: the global mainstream consumer.

Pepsi’s historic strategy wasn’t about flanking or bypassing — it went toe-to-toe.
By narrowing price gaps, matching distribution, and targeting the same mass market, it forced Coke to defend its position everywhere.

The result? While Coke remains #1, Pepsi secured massive market share and built an enduring brand by refusing to yield the front line.

A Modern Tech Example: Zoom vs. Webex

In the early days, Zoom didn’t outflank Cisco’s Webex with niche features or clever bypasses.
It simply built a better core product — faster, simpler video meetings — and then competed head-on for enterprise contracts.

The bet was that Webex’s complexity and inertia would slow its response.
Zoom’s relentless execution on quality, ease of use, and price proved that a well-led frontal assault can unseat even a well-funded incumbent.

Strategic Considerations (The Officer’s Lens)

Before you order a frontal attack, ask:

1. Do we have the stamina?
   A frontal assault is a resource war. If you can’t sustain it, don’t start it.
2. Can we out-execute, not just out-spend?
   The doctrine relies on winning the head-to-head contest by being simply better.
3. Is there real customer dissatisfaction with the incumbent?
   Without some latent frustration in the market, customers have little reason to switch.
4. Is our product category mature?
   Frontal attack tends to work best in mature or commoditized markets where the rules are already clear.

Frontal Attack is the most visible doctrine: everyone knows you’re coming.
That transparency raises the stakes — but it also simplifies the game plan.
Your team knows the target, your marketing is consistent, your product roadmap is focused.

Leaders who succeed with Frontal Attack often:

• Accept the price of battle as the cost of market entry.
• Keep the strategy singular and disciplined.
• Rally the organization around execution excellence.

Those who fail usually:

• Underestimate the incumbent’s resilience.
• Spread themselves thin in side battles.
• Burn resources before tipping customer loyalty.

Closing Insight

A Frontal Attack isn’t the cleverest doctrine — but it can be the decisive one.
When the market is ready for change and the incumbent has grown slow, a head-on fight can open the fastest path to relevance and scale.

“Sometimes the boldest move is to walk straight into the front gate — not because it’s easy, but because it’s where the real prize is.”

‍